Obsidian AI Agent Security Academy

The practitioner's guide to securing AI agents

From MCP server risks to machine identity and runtime guardrails — everything security engineers and CISOs need to govern agentic AI without slowing adoption.

xxx
Articles
·
xxx
Security Pillars
·
Updated
September 22, 2026
All (0)
Visibility & Shadow AI
Threat Explainer
ToF
Risks Of Agentic Ai

Risks of Agentic AI: The Complete Threat Overview for Security Teams

AI agents are not just a new tool category. They are a new threat class, and the security tools you already own were built for a world where humans took actions and machines waited for instructions.
Category & Definitions
Definition
ToF
What Is Genai Security

What Is GenAI Security? How Generative AI Changes the Threat Model

GenAI is a distinct discipline governing where generative AI tools sit in your environment, what data flows into them, and what happens when those tools connect to systems that take action on your behalf. In 2026, most enterprise security teams are still operating with the wrong definition. Understanding what GenAI security actually covers, where its boundaries sit, and where a newer discipline called agentic AI security picks up is now a prerequisite for any credible AI risk program.
Category & Definitions
Definition
ToF
What Is Agentic Ai Security

What Is Agentic AI Security? A Security-First Definition

Most AI agents running in enterprise environments today hold more access than any single workflow they execute actually requires. They act autonomously, chain actions across SaaS applications, and authenticate using embedded credentials that your IAM program has never reviewed. Understanding what is agentic AI security means accepting one uncomfortable truth first: the security model you built for human users does not apply to machines that act like insiders but appear in no insider risk program you own.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
300×
increase in AI agent activity, 2025
40%
of agents carry medium-to-critical risk
800+
risky agents in avg enterprise environment
25–50×
native tools built to see agent identity
Source: Obsidian Security Research, 2026

The six pillars of AI agent security

Get new AI agent security research in your inbox.
New articles, threat research, and CISO briefings — no spam, unsubscribe any time.
See every AI agent in your environment — in 30 minutes.
Obsidian surfaces agent inventory, toxic combinations, and MCP server activity across 8 platforms. No connector required.
Get a Demo
No setup required · 30-min session

Trusted by leading security teams

AI agent security: frequently asked questions

What is AI agent security?

AI agent security is the practice of governing, monitoring, and enforcing policy over autonomous AI systems — agents — that take actions inside business applications without direct human instruction for each step. It differs from traditional application security because agents hold persistent credentials, execute multi-step workflows, and access sensitive SaaS systems at a scale and speed that human oversight cannot track manually.

How is AI agent security different from prompt security?

Prompt security governs what human users submit to language models: filtering sensitive data, detecting injection attempts, blocking harmful outputs. AI agent security governs what autonomous agents do after they receive their instructions — which credentials they use, which SaaS applications they access, which actions they chain.

What is a toxic combination in AI agent security?

A toxic combination occurs when multiple medium-severity risk factors exist simultaneously on a single agent, compounding into a critical-priority finding. Example: embedded admin credentials + org-wide public access + disabled creator account = critical blast radius, no owner.